MS Project, Oracle Primavera P6
- Built for
- one planner, one project per plan
- Where it gets tight
- departments do not plan along, no utilisation across projects
Direct comparisonMS Project Primavera
For project-driven industrial companies

Quick Answer
Project management software for industry keeps the dates, capacity, tasks and suppliers of several parallel projects in one system, in which each department plans its own part. Common tools such as MS Project, Excel, Asana or ERP project modules each cover one slice: a plan, a team or the costs. Linetrack, based in Stuttgart, connects scheduling and capacity planning across all projects and departments. Customers use it to run between 5 and more than 270 parallel projects.
named Excel and tool
chaos as their starting problem
replaced Excel lists
and planning tools
projects running in parallel
at the largest customer
departments planning together
at the largest customers
Every figure on this page comes from a full survey of all live Linetrack implementations, as of August 2026.
Challenges
Most project management tools are built for one project, one team or one task list. Industrial projects have more of everything: more projects at the same time, more departments in the plan, more dependencies outside the company. This shows in four places.
Each project plan is consistent on its own. None of them shows that electrical design is booked in three of them at the same time. The conflict surfaces when the first deadline is missed.


Design, production, assembly and purchasing keep their own Excel files. Project management collects the status by email and in meetings and plans with last week's version. 91 % of Linetrack customers named exactly this as their starting problem.


A bought-in part arrives three weeks late, and assembly is the last to find out. As long as external dates sit in inboxes, they are missing from the critical path.


ERP project modules handle order accounting cleanly. Who works on which activity and when is not recorded there. Scheduling moves back into Excel.


Features
Every project management tool schedules dates and assigns tasks. For industrial projects that is not enough. These nine features decide whether a system can carry day-to-day work with many projects and departments. What applies specifically to steering many projects is set out in the requirements for multi-project management software.
Activities, dependencies and critical path across all projects, not per file.
Gantt planning for multiple projectsProject management sets milestones, and the departments plan their activities beneath them.
High-level and detailed planningUtilisation per person, team and department, across projects, with conflict indicators.
Resource and capacity planningBaseline against current status, deviations in working days.
Planned vs. actual comparison in projectsAll projects with status, priority and bottlenecks in one view for management.
Managing the project portfolioExternal partners maintain their own dates through their own login, with visibility of their activities only.
Bringing suppliers into projectsSAP and other ERP systems, time tracking such as AIDA, import from Excel, MS Project and Primavera, REST API.
Interfaces and integrationsAsk about dates, project status and utilisation in a chat, within the permissions of the person asking.
AI in project managementPlacement
Search for project management software and you will find lists of twenty products. A better first question is what shape of work a tool was built for: how many projects run in parallel and how many departments plan together.
The strengths and limits of each category are set out in detail in the multi-project management software comparison, and all individual comparisons under project management software compared.
Typical tools
Six categories with their typical tools: what each one is built for and the point at which it stops being enough for projects with many departments. Each card leads to the detailed direct comparison.
Direct comparisonMS Project Primavera
Direct comparisonAsana monday.com Trello
Direct comparisonStackfield Microsoft To Do
Direct comparisonExcel
Direct comparisonERP project module
Direct comparisonFinite scheduling
Solution
Linetrack sits in the top right of the matrix. Many projects, many departments, suppliers in the same plan. Three things are built differently from the common tools to make that work.
Design estimates the design work, assembly estimates the assembly work. Project management no longer has to collect the status; it can see it.


When an activity moves, utilisation changes at the same moment. No reconciliation between the schedule and a capacity list.


External partners see only their own activities and report dates back directly. If a part is late, assembly sees it the same day.


High-level and detailed
In many companies one person plans for everyone and asks for the status every week. That works up to about five projects. After that, the plan is always a week old.
In Linetrack, project management sets milestones and delivery dates, and each department plans its own activities beneath them. Roles govern who has which permissions.
Role-based views per department
Changes appear in the portfolio immediately
Feedback on the activity, also via the mobile app
One set of data instead of many files

Dates and utilisation
The schedule sits in MS Project, utilisation in Excel or the ERP. The two are reconciled by hand.
Linetrack calculates both from the same data: beneath the bar chart sits the capacity histogram for all projects. What that looks like in day-to-day work is shown in scheduling and capacity planning in one system.

Suppliers
Bought-in parts, subcontractors and service providers determine the end date in many projects. In Linetrack they appear as activities in the plan and maintain their own dates. If a part is late, assembly sees the consequences the same day.
How this differs from classic supplier management in projects is covered on a separate page.

Implementation and operation
The rollout starts in project management and grows from there into the departments. Ongoing projects continue as normal in the meantime.
The full process is described on the page implementing project management software.
Operation
As a cloud service from a data centre in Germany in line with the GDPR, with a data processing agreement, or in your own data centre.
Comparison
Task tools and classic planning tools are well built for their purpose. For projects in which many departments and suppliers depend on one plan, each of them is missing a different piece.
References
Four companies from machine building, special-purpose machinery and automation that started with Excel lists or another system and now plan their projects across departments in Linetrack.

“A solution that works”
Niklas Reitinger, Head of Project Management
Replaced a project management system and isolated planning lists in individual departments. Planning now runs from the sales phase to project tracking in one system.

“Everything always in view”
Tammo Bettex, Managing Director
One work breakdown structure for all areas: each area maintains its element, and the status of the whole project follows from that.

“A clear added value for our work”
Philipp Lang, Management
Development projects planned and tracked across departments: each area runs its own tasks and works directly with development.

“Our old PM tool, fully replaced”
Matthias Kramer, Managing Partner
Replaced separate tools and lists. All projects now run on one platform, with an overview of schedules, resources and status.
Fit
Linetrack is built for project-driven industrial companies in which several projects run in parallel and several departments plan together.
Several projects run in parallel and share the same departments.
Several departments plan themselves instead of feeding a central project manager.
Suppliers and external trades appear as activities in the schedule.
ERP and time tracking are connected instead of forming another silo.
Typical customers have 20 to 300 employees, up to more than 30 departments and 5 to over 270 parallel projects. That is not a hard limit; Linetrack also runs in considerably larger companies. For smaller businesses: project management software for SMEs.

Limits
No system is right for everything, Linetrack included. In these two cases another category gets there faster:

Industries
The same platform, tailored to the processes and terminology of each industry.
By audience: project management software for SMEs and Linetrack for design engineers.

Long engineering lead times, bought-in parts on the critical path, shared designers and fitters.
Project management software for machinery and plant engineering
One-off production in which every machine is a project of its own with its own engineering.
Project management in special-purpose machine building
Many parallel sites, fitters in the field, trades from external contractors.
Project control in building, energy and automation technology
Crews, equipment and subcontractors across several construction projects.
Project control in construction and infrastructure
Development and internal projects that compete with day-to-day business for the same people.
Project management for development and internal projectsFAQ
Book a slot with our team.
Read on
The features behind connected scheduling and capacity planning: